2023-10-18
improvements |
---|
I feel that the data could have been simplified and broken down a bit more. It requires a lot of reading of the figure legend to work out what the data is showing and is not as easily read. There is a lot of figures crammed into the one area so the data could have been separatd a bit more to make it less overwhelming to read. |
More visual colors for A and B and a better use of space |
The images should be larger |
I think in some of the figures there is too much text where a key could have been added to make the figure more readable. |
improvements |
---|
It felt a bit cluttered and hard to read, I’d space out the figure legend a bit more to be more specific than cluster 2A, 2B together to make it clear what section means what and for figure 2F use a line of best fit to help declutter all the points. |
F is a little crowded and the significance indication is very similar to data points, so could be confusing. |
Scatter plots could be clearer |
clearer separation of legend colours |
more spaced out using less colours with more graphs and less diagramd of mice. |
Maybe inverse the colour contrast for better visuals, (lighter background over darker colour oresenting fluorescence) |
I would consider a different presentation for part (e) and (f). Just personal preference. Also, images make the paper harder to make accessible and printer-friendly. |
Add lines to the graphs bar/lime graph |
N/a |
improvements |
---|
less busy would be best as its overwhelmin gin figure E and F |
Not sure why they used two different colour schemes for representing March and February in figure D - perhaps just use the same one. |
more straightforward |
more text description of 3C and change colours in3D |
I don’t |
A clearer description of figures and need statistical analysis |
Some of the panels were a little clumped together and it would be a bit clearer to have them more spread out |
Make the scale consistent by incorporating a percentage or arbitrary units that take population of the state into account; make the bar graph a line graph on the same grid. |
less data |
A little more informative |
improvements |
---|
The figure looks cluttered and could have been better presented in transparent boxes to differentiate the data types being shown. |
Using more than one type of data representation, and making sure that data is easier to distinguish. Maybe even combining some to allow for easy comparison. |
Can change to another type of data visualisation such as Box and Whisker Plot |
The figure was presented relatively well I just did not know how I should be reading the figure. However I believe maybe a different type of graph would be more effective, I’m not sure how you would be able to fit all the essential information into the graph however. |
Different colours |
Multiple IFNs in the same figure? |
Making the panels bigger to understand and have the ability to see the trends as well as individual data which would allow us to spot anomalies too. |
Less is more |
different methods of data presentation |
improvements |
---|
// |
Try to simplify it and make it more clear |
adjust scales |
Better scaling of graphs. More succinct and clear figure legend which pertains to the data presented. |
Pair box plots with scatter plots will help the reader understand the distribution of the data points better |
the labels for x and y-axis can be more detailed and include units of measurements |
They could make it easier too replicate. |
Make it less dense, changing colours to black/white shapes inside some graphs |
I’m not sure it can, the data that is being presented is inherently confusing so I’m not sure improvements can be made |
improvements |
---|
each section is quite busy-looking, maybe spreading them out and making the labels a bit more simple |
include each generation in C for consistency |
NA |
The various sub-figures could have been better categorised in their own respective boxes because this figure looks quite crowded with a lot going on |
A and B should be on one panel |
C should be figure on its own D-G should be on one panel H-J should be on one panel | |Make it less crowded | |Make the figure legend clearer | |lighter colour scheme, it can be hard to read and see all the data due to dark colours |
improvements |
---|
Better colour selection, less colours where unneccessary, more whitespace |
use slightly brighter colours, the dull colours look similar and its difficult to decern them |
Make it more spaces and change to a better visualisation type such as bar chart which is clearer. |
simpflify it |
Graphs could have been made larger to make it easier to read the data points and results. Words were blurred due to being too small. |
Use more appropriate colour/pattern scheme. |
Make the font size bigger, especially for Figure 1A. |
Panel G is in most need of attention |
More clear |
The figure is kinda hard to read in powerpoint, but thats probably just the impact of the insertion into a powerpoint slide. I can’t be bothered to check the paper. |
Visualise it differently |
Try and simplify them, compact them |
maybe specify on less cell types |
improvements |
---|
make some of the figures bigger as they are a little small and i have to zoom to see them better |
Not sure. |
Looks a bit cluttered, not very eye-catching so maybe space it out a bit and add better colour |
Split it up, make the text bigger and provide a better legend. |
less data on the page, data should be made at a larger scale so its readable |
N/A |
Panel E has variations in shapes and its not clear why and the colors aren’t accessible to all |
its amazing, stunning, I don’t know. |
N/A |
improvements |
---|
Figure E’s error bars have a weird colour that makes them look faded and hard to look at |
Maybe use more contrasting colours |
F and G were difficult to understand/visualise. Text was rather small and difficult to read. Requires the reader to look between the figure legend and data to understand it is showing. The colours were also not extremely clear making it difficult to see clear groups. Figure E was particularly difficult to interpret due to a blurred effect of the colours used in the graph. |
Better labelling of graphs with age groups, error bars on bar graphs, more breakdown of complicated data into readable graphs, more detailed figure legend. |
further explanation and figure titles |
more spaced out graphs with clear outlines and the diagrams in section b are quite hard to understand so maybe a simpler version to get the point across. |
Uhh |
PUTTING THE BOTTOM DATAT INTO A TABLE INSTEAD OF A WHEEL WOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO VISUALIZE |
less numbers less figures |
improvements |
---|
Layout figure A and B better |
larger diagrams and graphs with clear distinctions |
the graphs can be labelled better |
The images could be larger and the bars on the chart could also be larger to allow for reading against the scale. |
Unsure |
making it clear the difference between part A and B and seperating the graphs in part B would help |
Better colour difference |
given a lot of info at once, maybe break it down a bit |
Make the distinction between panels clearer |